Investment losses can involve complicated transactions, multiple companies, underlying assets and substantial documentation.
Our case studies demonstrate the types of situations that a specialist recovery team may be asked to investigate.
From fine wine and whisky to property bonds, art and alternative investments, every case requires a careful assessment of the individual circumstances.
An investor placed £185,000 into a managed fine wine portfolio over two years. Communication faltered, documentation was unclear and the company later entered insolvency proceedings.
A private investor committed £250,000 to a property-backed investment. Expected payments were missed and communication with the investment company became increasingly limited.
A client invested £96,000 across a portfolio of maturing whisky casks and later became concerned about the status of the casks and the documentation supporting ownership.
An investor committed £320,000 to an art investment portfolio and was left unsure which of several individuals and entities were responsible for each part of the arrangement.
A client invested £75,000 into a scheme introduced through a professional contact, then experienced difficulties obtaining information and receiving expected payments.
£410,000 Diversified Alternative Investment Portfolio
Lost
£410,000
Recovered
£286,000
Recovery
69.8%
A sophisticated investor held £410,000 across several alternative investments involving different companies and asset classes, and needed the position consolidated into one chronology.
Case studies are presented for demonstration purposes and are illustrative of the types of matters a specialist recovery team may be asked to investigate. Every investment recovery matter is assessed individually. The circumstances of the investment, the available evidence, the parties involved and the applicable recovery process will determine the appropriate course of action.
Public Record
Documented Investment Fraud & Failure Cases
The cases below are drawn from public records. Each is a real, documented matter recorded by the Financial Conduct Authority, the Insolvency Service, the Serious Fraud Office, the courts or Companies House.
Figures, dates and outcomes are stated as they appear in the official source, which is cited in full at the end of every case. Nothing has been added, estimated or embellished.
These are not BJM Recovery Ltd client matters. They are published for information, so that investors can recognise the patterns that recur across cryptocurrency and alternative investment losses.
Documented Case
PGI Global UK Ltd
Investment
Cryptocurrency and forex trading packages
Losses
Approximately £612,425 received from would-be investors
Period
Traded July 2020 to February 2021; wound up 27 October 2022
Organisation
The Insolvency Service / High Court
A UK company that sold cryptocurrency and forex trading packages promising returns of up to 200%. The Insolvency Service reported that approximately £612,425 was received from would-be investors before the company was wound up in the public interest.
Cryptocurrency 'education' and investment promotion
Losses
Investigators identified a £5m transfer that could not be accounted for; individual investor losses reported
Period
Wound up in the public interest in 2024
Organisation
The Insolvency Service / High Court
A UK cryptocurrency 'education' company promoted crypto investment schemes, including HyperFund. The Insolvency Service raised concerns about the assurances given to consumers and about the company's accounting records, and it was wound up in the public interest.
Fake cryptocurrency investments sold by cold-calling
Losses
£1,541,799 lost by at least 65 investors (FCA)
Period
February 2017 to June 2019; sentenced 4 July 2025
Organisation
Financial Conduct Authority
Raymondip Bedi and Patrick Mavanga cold-called investors and sold fake cryptocurrency investments through a professional-looking website. The FCA reported losses of £1,541,799 across at least 65 investors, and both men were convicted and imprisoned.
Complaints received from customers in six countries; no single aggregate figure published
Period
Winding-up petition March 2025; wound up 2025
Organisation
The Insolvency Service / High Court
A UK-registered company sold cryptocurrency mining services to customers around the world. Customers reported paying for mining services, not receiving what was promised, and then facing further payment demands. The company was wound up in the public interest.
A purportedly London-based company sold 'all-or-nothing' investment products by cold-calling. The FCA documented approximately £1.2m of losses across around 120 investors, and three individuals were sentenced to a combined 24 and a half years.
An online cryptocurrency trading platform that attracted clients using fabricated celebrity endorsements. Nearly £1.5m of client funds were lost and the company was wound up in the public interest.
The first UK conviction for illegally operating a network of crypto ATMs. Olumide Osunkoya processed over £2.5m of cryptoasset transactions through 28 locations after the FCA refused his registration, and was sentenced to four years' imprisonment.
Unauthorised deposit-taking for forex and cryptoasset projects
Losses
Interim restitution order of just over £676,000 (FCA)
Period
Proceedings from December 2019; restitution order February 2021
Organisation
Financial Conduct Authority / High Court
The FCA brought High Court proceedings over deposits taken from the public for forex and cryptoasset projects without authorisation, securing an interim restitution order of just over £676,000.
Unauthorised collective investment schemes, including a Bitcoin-linked scheme
Losses
£16.9m ordered in restitution by the High Court (FCA)
Period
Schemes promoted from 2009; High Court judgment 26 March 2018
Organisation
Financial Conduct Authority / High Court
The FCA succeeded in High Court proceedings concerning four unauthorised collective investment schemes, including a Bitcoin-linked scheme, with £16.9m ordered in restitution to investors.
No aggregate customer loss figure has been officially published
Period
Winding-up order 31 January 2020
Organisation
High Court / appointed joint liquidators
A UK cryptocurrency exchange, later renamed Dragon Payments Ltd, was placed into compulsory liquidation in January 2020 following a creditor dispute, leaving customer and creditor claims to be dealt with through the insolvency process.
Losses reported to run into millions; final position subject to liquidation
Period
Ceased trading December 2025; compulsory winding-up order 4 March 2026
Organisation
High Court / City of London Trading Standards
A City of London fine wine merchant that sold wine and champagne as an investment stopped trading in December 2025. Trading Standards warned customers they may not get their money back, and a compulsory winding-up order followed.
A UK fine wine investment firm took money from retail investors for wine it did not have. Creditors were owed in excess of £3m and the company was closed by the High Court.
Not quantified in a single official figure; customers reported to have lost pension sums
Period
Wound up by the High Court 8 October 2024
Organisation
The Insolvency Service / Official Receiver
A whisky cask investment company was wound up by the High Court. The Official Receiver reported that the company was not the proprietor of the whisky held in bonded warehouses and held no interest in it — a finding with significant consequences for customers who believed they owned casks.
Liquidators' High Court claim concerned sums reported at around $11m
Period
Liquidators appointed August 2023; High Court judgment 4 October 2024
Organisation
High Court (Chancery Division) / joint liquidators
A London art investment firm entered liquidation, after which the joint liquidators brought High Court proceedings against connected individuals and companies to recover assets for creditors.
No aggregate investor loss figure has been officially published
Period
Winding-up petition advertised; company status recorded as in liquidation
Organisation
The Gazette / Companies House
A London gallery offering managed contemporary art investment services entered liquidation following a winding-up petition, illustrating the wider growth of 'investment galleries' marketing art as a safe haven asset.
Unregulated property development bonds and loan notes
Losses
Liabilities of approximately £211m on administration; investors reported left £123m out of pocket
Period
Administration December 2021; subsequently liquidated
Organisation
Administrators / liquidators
A Newcastle property developer funded by unregulated investor bonds collapsed into administration in December 2021 with liabilities of around £211m, leaving individual bondholders very substantially out of pocket.
Loan notes funding German heritage property redevelopment
Losses
Millions of pounds of UK pension savings not returned
Period
Marketed from the 2010s; preliminary bankruptcy proceedings in Germany October 2020
Organisation
FCA / FSCS / Financial Ombudsman Service / German insolvency courts
German Property Group, also known as Dolphin Trust, sold loan notes to UK investors, frequently through pension transfers, to fund the redevelopment of German listed buildings. It failed to repay capital or interest and entered bankruptcy proceedings in Germany in October 2020.
Cathedral View, Derby — student accommodation development
Investment
Off-plan student accommodation units
Losses
More than £4m lost by 42 investors, with no money returned
Period
Insolvency Service investigation and director disqualifications
Organisation
The Insolvency Service
Forty-two investors paid more than £4m towards a Derby city-centre student accommodation development. The Insolvency Service found investors were misled about the use of their money, no funds were returned, and three directors were disqualified.
Costa Rican tree plantation investment, funded largely from pensions
Losses
£70m investment fraud affecting approximately 3,000 UK investors (Serious Fraud Office)
Period
Scheme operated over seven years; convictions 16 January 2026
Organisation
Serious Fraud Office / Southwark Crown Court
Three former directors of Ethical Forestry Limited pleaded guilty to fraudulent trading following an SFO investigation into a £70m scheme that persuaded around 3,000 UK investors to move pension savings into Costa Rican tree plantations.
£2.5m raised from 208 investors, reported as a total loss
Period
Bonds sold July 2015 to September 2016; wound up 2019
Organisation
High Court (Manchester) / Insolvency Service
A company sold corporate bonds to 208 investors to fund anaerobic digestion plants, promising 11% per annum over five years. Around £2.5m was raised, most of it lent on to a connected company, and investors were reported as facing a total loss.
Hotel room investments sold to individual investors
Losses
Over a thousand investors reported to have committed approximately £80m across the group
Period
Collapse and administrations 2019; SFO investigation announced August 2021
Organisation
Serious Fraud Office / High Court
Hotel rooms in England and Wales were sold individually to retail investors, frequently through pensions, on the promise of guaranteed annual returns. Hotels went into administration in 2019 and the Serious Fraud Office opened an investigation in 2021.
Land banking — plots of agricultural and greenbelt land
Losses
£21m ordered to be paid for the benefit of investors (FCA)
Period
High Court declaration 2013; payment order following appeals; investor claims to 2025
Organisation
Financial Conduct Authority / High Court
Asset Land sold small plots of agricultural and greenbelt land to investors on the promise of rezoning for development. The courts held that this was an unauthorised collective investment scheme, and £21m was ordered to be paid for the benefit of investors.
These case studies summarise matters recorded in public sources including FCA publications, Insolvency Service and Serious Fraud Office material on GOV.UK, court judgments and the Companies House register. They are provided for information only, are not legal advice, and do not describe work carried out by BJM Recovery Ltd for any client. Where an investigation or set of proceedings remains open, the position stated is the position recorded at the date of the cited source.
Have you experienced something similar?
Investment losses can be complex and every situation is different. If you have lost money through an investment that has failed, become insolvent or stopped communicating, our team can assess the information available and discuss the potential next steps.