Background
Capital Alternatives Limited and a number of associated individuals promoted four collective investment schemes to UK retail investors. The schemes included a Bitcoin-related investment alongside agricultural land and carbon credit propositions.
None of the schemes was authorised as a collective investment scheme.
What investors were promised
Investors were offered high returns from alternative investments, marketed with statements the court found to be false, misleading or deceptive as to the nature and risk of the products and their regulatory status.
How the schemes operated
The schemes were promoted to retail consumers through marketing material without lawful authorisation and without adequate disclosure of risk.
Legal developments
After a lengthy legal process, the High Court handed down judgment on 26 March 2018 ordering the defendants to pay a total of £16.9m in restitution to investors under the FCA's powers in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
What the case demonstrates
Cryptoasset propositions are frequently bundled with other unregulated 'alternative' investments sold by the same promoters, and investors are often exposed to several of them.
The case also stands as one of the larger restitution figures obtained by the FCA through civil litigation.
Key Lesson
Where an unauthorised collective investment scheme has been promoted, the lack of authorisation is itself a substantive legal point and not merely a technicality.
Source & Further Information
FCA wins case against Capital Alternatives Limited and others
Financial Conduct Authority — published 26 March 2018
View the official source
